http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4429289437231286745&q=911+truth


There was a similar video posted in the past as well. But this one is more scientific.

Unfortunately, that's the whole truth and nothing but truth.

Sid,

america is one country all nations are eying on, which is understandale, they are super power. whatever happens in US, be it good or bad, people tend to come up with their own interpretations.

For instance:

1) American-- Neil Arm Strong on Apollo-11, was the first human being to land on the surface of moon.

hell no. it was a conspiracy theory

2) Fahrenheit 911 Vs Fahrenhype911

3) and now this one..

I am not sure, where to draw the line of credibility-- honestly i don't know...


Loote

I understand people hate BUSH and his govt. But in now way i am going to believe that they are so bad that they will kill 5000 innocent american lives like that!!They have gone war!!they have proved selfish in past!!
but i am not going to believe that they can do such thing no matter how much i hate bush!!
Some things it says lke :comparison of burning buidlings.he did not take account of the impact.May be the stucture was not good enough for twin towers.but planting bombs in their own city trying to kill own citizen is ridiculous accusation!!!!!

This was a TV broadcast from the deputy leader of Al-Qaeda regarding the Lebanon-Israel war. Looks like more trouble is on its way for U.K. and U.S.


"The shells and rockets which are tearing the bodies of Muslims in Gaza and Lebanon are not purely Israeli. They are produced and financed by all the countries of the Crusader alliance.

"Therefore, all those who have taken part in the crime must pay the price. We cannot just watch these shells as they pour wrath on our brothers in Gaza and Lebanon and sit back in submission."

Dude, didn't you hear the designer of the building himself saying that the buildings were made to stand multiple air collusions? I heard from a different source that the builidngs when they were build were the tallest in the world so a misguided plane collusion was thought of and the building reinforeced to stand the air collusion....
I still would not want to believe in the video itself though. Something still doesn't let me. The facts in the documentary are I think absolutely correct because I can verify most of them from more credible sources. So were all these evidence just a chance?

Please watch this documentary. This is the political aspect and motivation behind the 9/11.

Loose change 911

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1519312457137943386&q=loose+change

All i know is science doesnt lie.....seems like government doesnt want to answer any of those raised questions. I may not believe the way the video is made but science doestn lie and the government did the best to ignore valid questions.

Unasked Questions about the collapse of the World Trade Center on September 11 2001

"It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three (WTC) buildings," BYU physics professor Steven E. Jones says in Nov. 2005.
Fire fighter's magazine calls the destruction and removal of evidence "a half-baked farce" of investigation.
One (or more) eyewitness reported hearing a series of at least about "five" explosions in at least one of the buildings just before it came down. It LOOKED LIKE a professional demolition job. The "melting" theory makes little sense.
The FBI floors (22nd to 24th floors) of the North Tower had been devastated and reduced to debris BEFORE the building came down. On these floors the entire accumulation of evidence and investigation briefs on two highly important cases were being stored: the case against Mobil Oil and James Giffen on illegal oil swaps between Iran and Kazakhstan and evidence in the investigation of GOLD PRICE FIXING.

for details go to :
http://www.cam.net.uk/home/nimmann/peace/explosions.htm

The owner of building no. 7 comes on American television and says he wanted the building to be "pulled". Does that not mean that the explosives or the detonating bombs were already placed in the building beforehand? I mean to pull a building like that, you need months of planning for the structure of the building and steel that holds the building. The explosives have to be carefully placed so the building falls down inwards and not outwards. Outlandish!!

who to believe

Alright, I have been doing a little research of my own and I found at least one point that contradicts the two documentaries above and it is from a highly credible source unlike the two above:
The steel grade that was used in the WTC towers would loose 90% of its strength after being exposed to temperature above 1000 degrees for the period of 15 minutes. We know well that the temperature inside the buildings were well above ( around 3000-3500 degrees, and even the two documentaries mention it) and it burned more than 15 minutes.